I like conlangs(constructed languages), and I've made a few, but they were never good. While I know a few reasons why, I found a very good one: I made them, so they would be intrinsically suited to me. So, why not make one explicitly suited to me, like the conlang IS? So, the feature of this language is that I speak it. The audience is somewhat suited to me, as well.

Phonology?

These are all the IPA phonemes I know:

very important (english)

a (as in "high", but that is a dipthong)
b
d
e (a little under ɪ)
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
s
t
u
v
w
z

english consonants

x
ʒ
θ (voiceless)
ð
ʃ
ʔ
ŋ
ɹ

english vowels

ɑ
æ (bag)
ɛ (beg, ä)
ɪ (big)
ɒ (bog)
ɔ (north, choice, but these are both dipthongs)
ʊ (foot)
ʌ

german

ç (ich)
ø (ö, oe~o)
œ? (ö, oe~e)
ʏ (ü)

arabic

q
sˤ (ص)
dˤ
tˤ
ðˤ
ʕ (ع)

made from other sounds

ɣ (voiced x; x@g)
χ (x@q)
ʁ (voiced χ; χ+)
ɢ (q+)
y (ü, but keep it as close to i)
ɸ (f@p)
β (v@b)
ʙ (brbrbrbrbrbr)

Phonology

θ and its voiced form can be merged. This is the same with p, k, f, ʃ, x, ɣ, ɸ, and tˤ. j += ʏ+y, ø += œ, o += ɔ, p/β += ʙ, ʔ += ʕ. Now, the phonemes are:

			a p d e f k h i j l m n o s t u w z
			x S ' T N r A E ^ I O U _
			C W
			q Z D F
			V B

for:

			a p d e f k h i j l m n o s t u w z
			x ʃ ʔ θ ŋ ɹ ɑ æ ɛ ɪ ɒ ʊ ʌ
			ç ø
			q sˤ dˤ ðˤ
			β ɣ

While I can't be sure how true this will be to come, for now, morphemes have a one-to-one correlation to phonemes. this is tentative, though.

Writing

Graphemes however, cannot easily (atleast for me) be one-to-one with morphemes without using a different script. So I will both try and not try this...

No! Try not! Do, or do not, there is no try.

Idea pops up in my head:

			a p d e f k h i j l m n o s t u w z
			x ,s ' ,t .n r .a ,a y ,i ,o .o _
			.c .u
			q .s .t .f
			,f .x

Well, we can use those other letters, and make ˤ capital:

			a p d e f k h i j l m n o s t u w z
			x ,s ' v .n r .a ,a y ,i ,o .o _
			c .u
			q S T F
			b g

What about $ for ,s, ! for ,i, and * for .u?

			a p d e f k h i j l m n o s t u w z
			x $ ' v .n r .a ,a y ! ,o .o _
			c *
			q S  T  F
			b g

To compare with:

			a p d e f k h i j l m n o s t u w z
			x ʃ ʔ θ  ŋ ɹ  ɑ  æ ɛ ɪ  ɒ  ʊ ʌ
			ç ø
			q sˤ dˤ ðˤ
			β ɣ

Now, . "pulls things to *", and , "pulls things to !". I think this is O.K. for ASCII, but what about beyond that?

			a p d e f k h i j l m n o s t u w z
			x ʃ ' v ŋ r ä á y ɪ ó ö _
			c ɥ
			q S T F
			b g

To compare with:

			a p d e f k h i j l m n o s t u w z
			x ʃ ʔ θ ŋ ɹ ɑ æ ɛ ɪ ɒ ʊ ʌ
			ç ø
			q sˤ dˤ ðˤ
			β ɣ

Well, that was a lot easier once I did the ASCII part. Also, the grave can be any linear shape, and the umlaut can be any circular shape. They can also intersect the letter, or be a part of the letter, like ash. Same with the other . and ,s.

Okay, I think this is enough for today. See you later.

HALL